After reading the selection of articles, I was really troubled by the many problems and inequalities that they discuss. Despite the fact that women differ in many areas of life considering race and class, the issues women face stem from the same root- the issue of power. This problem of power manifests itself in different ways, but nonetheless, it is the common ground for many of the injustices women face. As Steinem writes “white, non-poor males, [is] the group most likely to become hooked on the drug of superiority.” This drug of superiority creates the power hierarchy, which allows men to act out in ways to assert their power. This assertion of power, as we discussed in class, can unfortunately lead to rape and murder. Steinem’s notion of supremacy crimes plays into this power hierarchy also, as these crimes establish male supremacy and help men “find a place in a male hierarchy.” The problem of this power hierarchy is evident not only in power play situations between women and men, but also in social situations among women, as demonstrated in Crenshaw’s article.
Both articles from the NY Times demonstrate the difficulties women face in the armed forces, due to the fact that merely being a woman is still a relatively new concept. While some claim to not feel the pressures of being a woman, both articles stress that women are indeed still feeling the pressures and prejudices of being the “othered” gender. When sexual abuse happens in these circumstances, the dilemma of whether or not to report the abuse is doubled, as reporting the incident may cause waves of trouble for investigations and perhaps compromising their missions. Some women become reluctant to report the abuse in fear of their safety because they live in such quarters. However, when some women did choose to report the abuse, they were treated with punishments. Instead of focusing on the rape investigation, abuse coordinators chastised Helen Benedict for leaving her post and weapon. Instead of focusing investigations on a report abuse case, Sgt. Tracey R. Phillips was asked to leave the Army. I think the fact that “ a woman in the military is more likely to be raped by a fellow soldier than killed by enemy fire in Iraq” is a horrifying and sad statistic. It demonstrates that despite the fact that women are risking their lives and fighting alongside of men, men still do not consider women as their equals. Carrying out these acts of sexual violence is just another way for men to assert their power and “superiority.”
Some women also find themselves pitted against another battle of power, as outlined in Kimberle Crenshaw’s article. Crenshaw argues that women, and in most cases, women of color, struggle to come to terms with abuse, and how to report and react to it. Like the women discussed in the NY Times articles, Crenshaw’s women are faced with the issue of reporting their cases of abuse. For some women, reporting the abuse might cause investigations into their families, and some women do not want to run the risk of their families being investigated. Some women face the threat of being deported and being solely dependent on the person who is abusing them. I was most troubled by the case of the Hispanic woman and her son who were turned away from the shelter because she did not speak English. Although I understand the point of workers not being able to communicate with them, the fact that they knew she was living on the streets and still did not accept her is alarming. These shelters are supposed to be safe havens for women who are abused; a place where they can live free of the fear of their abusers. It seems unfair to me that some women are turned down because of their language capabilities. As Crenshaw suggests, this opens up another hierarchy of power, but this time it is among women themselves. Cases like this show that even in the most dire circumstances women still have to overcome the obstacle of who is holding the power.
I was a little troubled by Steinem's article because she explicitly states that she's not talking about blame, she's talking about causation. However, then she goes on to discuss the "white male problem," declaring that parents should raise their sons "to value empathy as well as hierarchy; to measure success by other people's welfare as well as their own." She is declaring that more often than not, white males want superiority -- resting the blame on their thirst for power, and even on the way they have been raised by their parents. I think that a lot of crimes, not just those committed by white, middle class, heterosexual males are driven by the desire for power. She says that the Columbine boys killed for no other reason than because they could. If a woman robs a bank, she might be doing it because she needs the money, but the underlying motive might simply be because she can. In that sense, I think all criminal acts -- murder, rape, assault, robbery, theft, anything at all -- committed by any gender, race, religion, class, are intrinsically linked to power.
ReplyDeleteThe two military articles seemed to contrast one another to me. "A Peril in War Zones" readily discussed the issues that women face in war zones -- assault, rape, violence -- and emphasized that they often do not want to report these cases in fear of disrupting the mission or hurting their company's morale. On the other hand, "Living and Fighting Alongside Men" was a lot more encouraging. Myers described how far women in the Army have come, and how it's not such a big deal anymore. He says how "Women in today’s military say they do not feel the same pressure to prove themselves. They adapt and expect others to adapt. They preserve their femininity without making much of it." This statement reminded me of a point brought up in class Tuesday when someone was talking about how they didn't think it was fair that women are subjected to violence, but yet, they are the ones that are forced to adapt and take self-defense classes. It should be the other way around, in that the perpetrators should adapt by NOT committing these heinous acts in the first place; instead, women have the double burden of fearing these attacks, potentially being attacked, and then being forced to learn "how not" to get attacked via classes or education. However, in the armed forces, the women have a different mentality in that, it's not their problem if other people have a problem with their presence. They are there to do their job, and do it well, and to help the company and their country succeed, just like any male. If male officers have issues with that, then they are the ones who are disrupting company morale and hurting the mission. Ideally, this is the type of attitude that all women would exude in a perfect world: they would go about their business without fear or anxiety about what might happen to them, and not worry about the actions of others. Unfortunately, given the culture in which we live, I don't believe that this ideal mentality could transfer over from the armed forces to mainstream society.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThis is my second skipped post!
ReplyDeleteI thought the article "peril in war zones" was very revealing to life inside the armed forces. I believe these situations occur not because these soldiers are sex crazed, but because they have had to have fallen in rank for so long. When there is always a superior, always someone telling you what to do, when to do it, how to do it etc. These men see an opportunity to gain power, and even if it is wrong, they want to do it. they want that feeling and will break rules to get it. I believe Captain White's story shows that that in many situations, pschycological issues are not the only problems with rape.
ReplyDeleteI have to say I generally dislike Steinem's article, largely because she is blatantly using only certain examples to support her theory. Information found on the internet states that 35.2% of all murders are by the black race, and around 33% are from people of the white race. I understand her point is to show that killings such as serial murders, and mass murders but the way she presents things makes it seem like she is saying other races are not generally not educated, or jaded enough to commit these murders. however, the whole priviledged white male power killing for greater power is a trend in many movies and shows today. Stepfather, a recent movie about a man who finds a family, marries into it, then starts asserting power until he finally kills them all is a perfect example of a man middle class homosexual man who feeds off this power. This is just one of many examples about how we are letting these ideas creep in and remain in society. The fact that we are perfectly happy on paying 8 dollars to go to a theatre and watch a man rape, or kill someone on the big screen is us obbsessing about power. Think about what our world would be like if things like rape, sexual violence, serial killing, and mass murder shows were not created. Would the world be better? I think so, maybe not a huge amount, but if it saves a woman from that situation happening, its worth it.
Brittany, Maria, and Lisa,
ReplyDeleteGreat thoughts! You've all done beautiful jobs discussing the primary points in today's readings, and reflecting on the possibilities and problems with the author's presentation. Lisa and Brittany, you're right: there are limitations to Steinem's writing. What's useful, though, is her call to think about identity categories and violence against women more carefully, and to acknowledge when these crimes are committed by white, straight, non-poor men. Brittany, I appreciate the ideas you raise about the media, as well; as we discussed in class, this is a crucial piece of the puzzle. Finally, Maria, great thoughts about Crenshaw and the ways in which women face intersecting pressures and difficulties!
Upon reading the first paragraph of this post I tried to change my usual perspective. Maria highlights that, "Steinem writes 'white, non-poor males, [is] the group most likely to become hooked on the drug of superiority.'" The first time I read Steinem's article I was easily convinced that this was true. However, upon taking a few steps back and coming back to the same issues (such as this quote) I am beginning to go down a different path. Without really addressing whether males are addicted to "the drug of superiority" or not, I start to wonder if the majority of women are addicted to the drug of "inferiority". Clearly, women have been seen as the lesser counterpart of the human race for some time now. Why do women allow this stereotype to continue? Why are the strong females that try to change the status quo often stigmatized and looked down upon? This train of thought reminded me of our class discussion earlier in the semester. How do women use their seemingly inferior status to their benefit? We discussed trying to get out of a speeding ticket as one of the strongest examples. After thinking about this concept, I am determined to find more examples and prevent myself from actively participating in the drug of inferiority.
ReplyDeleteOn a side note, in my opinion, the "Manifesta" authors gave some more good ideas on how not to be a "weak" woman.
I am really glad that I am able to go back to the Steinam article now that class has concluded and that I am able to look back on how I originally felt while reading the article. While I (oppositely of Caren) felt that Steinam's point was extremely far-reaching when I first read her article, recent events of this past week have made me think twice. The recent killing of Yeardley Love at UVA has been widely discussed in the news nation-wide. On many of the blogs, people have been questioning why this particular murder has received such attention when kids in the inner-cities who are equally as bright and loving students are not given the same publicity. The answer undoubtedly lies in the fact that both, and especially the killer, came from prominent families. This murder is exactly what Steinam would refer to as a supremacy crime. But it also has made me aware of another issue. Within hours of the first report, I as well of many of my friends had heard back from several of our friends at other schools who either went to high school with Yeardley or George, had played lacrosse with either of them, or in my case had been good friends with her all throughout college. It amazed me that while the news outlets were reporting presumably everything they knew regarding the murder, my friend and I knew infinitely more about the situation and what had gone down. While people often talk about the New England-Mid-Atlantic connection and how everyone knows everyone, this situation has really made me aware of the fact that as a privileged white women who attended a prestigious boarding school, I am automatically connected to a large number of other similarly situated young adults. And as several of our authors have asked, it is not a matter of denouncing this privilege and more one of what you will do with it.
ReplyDelete